|
RPM Range
|
Model
|
C/W at 2 lpm (Low flow)
|
C/W at 4 lpm (Medium Flow)
|
C/W at 6 lpm (High flow)
|
|
900
|
QP
|
.057
|
.055
|
.0545
|
|
900
|
XP
|
.0595
|
.0585
|
.058
|
|
1200
|
QP
|
.043
|
.0405
|
.0395
|
|
1200
|
XP
|
.0425
|
.0417
|
.0401
|
|
1500
|
QP
|
.036
|
.0337
|
.0325
|
|
1500
|
XP
|
.0355
|
.0336
|
.033
|
|
2000
|
QP
|
.0305
|
.0285
|
.0278
|
|
2000
|
XP
|
.029
|
.0268
|
.0258
|
We can see above that in the 900 rpm range,the QP is better at any flow rate. Conversely, in the2000 rpm range, the XP is better at any flow rate.
In between these two extremes, the resultsare flow rate dependant.
In low flow rate systems the XP is superior at anyrpm range starting at 1200 rpm.
In medium flow rate systems, the QP is better at 1200 rpm, and the XP is better at 1500 and 2000 rpm.
In high flow rate systems, the QP is better at 1200 and and 1500 rpm,s and the XP is better at 2000 rpm.